transition


“I would like to change my name,” I said, “as well as my sex.” How’s that for an introduction? That’s the scene from today’s visit to the Social Security Administration. Even though I knew from some hard-to-find webpage at their website that they wouldn’t change “sex” without a letter from a surgeon, I figured I’d visit my local SSA office today to change at least my name.

I arrived about 11:00 and waited in a medium-sized room filled with what appeared to be mostly people of color and age waiting to file claims or correct paperwork related to their social security benefits. The only people I would put in my obvious category (name change, not sex change) was a young woman and her mother, who sat a few rows in front of me babbling happily about being newly married and examining a checklist of places to go and offices to inform of her new name.

After waiting for perhaps 30 minutes, they called my number and a Hispanic woman opened the door to usher me into the large room containing perhaps 15 cubicles of SSA caseworkers. Diane showed me to her desk, brightly personalized with pictures of her family and artwork, asking me as I sat down, “What can I do for you?”

“I would like to change my name,” I said, “as well as my sex. Here is my court order for both, along with my form requesting for a new social security card.”

Before she began reading the court order, she looked warmly in my eyes and said, “First of all, congratulations.”

“Thanks,” I said, “That’s awfully nice of you to say, by the way.”

She smiled and read the court order softly to herself, looking briefly at my driver’s license to check that I was who I said I was. When she reached the end, just about when I expected her to say she could change my name but not my sex, she said, “OK — this won’t be any trouble.” She began keying the information from my application into her computer, pausing to complain that she simply couldn’t type today for some reason. She shredded my old social security card and printed the official change paperwork for me to examine, and sure enough, it was what I asked for.

She said I ought to be receiving my new card in a couple of weeks and then asked about my nail polish: “Is that clear or is there a little bit of color? I really like how that looks.”

“Thank you,” I said, looking at the nails and wondering where all those chips in the polish came from and thinking that it really is time for a manicure. “I think it’s a color called Bamboo and this one might be from Sally Hansen, but I’m not really sure.”

“I used to have one just like it that I wore all the time,” she offered, “but they quit making it.”

She said we were finished and wished me good luck.

Even though it was a pretty shallow conversation, it seemed to me Diane made a serious effort at humanizing the experience, making a gesture of inclusion, and the whole visit to her office — warm, friendly, and helpful — stands in contrast to the needlessly bureaucratic and officious attitude I encountered at the FAA the other day.

As Wade’s words began to sink in and I tried to process what I was feeling in between the gulps of grief and the reminiscences of our youth, I found myself feeling, then understanding, two different kinds of loss.

Putting myself in Wade’s head, I can imagine having a range of negative feelings, but with his repetition of my word “loyalty,” it seems to me that the predominant feeling must be betrayal, the feeling that Caesar feels, knives in his body as he turns to see his friend Brutus plunging his knife too — and the pain in his voice saying et tu, Brute?, not the pain of the knife inflicting mortal blows, but of the betrayal of a trusted friend, one who, in today’s lingo, was supposed to “have his back.” The loss Wade feels is permanent, painful, and personal, and it topples a fixed and happy memory of our relationship, sitting on his mind like a dark ink stain on the front of his Armani dress shirt. And I can relate to that, and am tempted to feel the same way about Wade’s rejection.

But I am also aware of a second type of loss, not one that falls into a nostalgia of the past, congealed in our minds like the Jello that remains uneaten at a dinner, where things are either quite right or are terribly wrong, but rather one that provides an occasion for possibility and promise, tinged with sadness but also pointing towards an integration of past, present, and future where we are whole and free from pain.

As a vision of this second type of loss began to materialize in my mind in the hours and days after Wade’s email rejection, I became aware of an accompanying soundtrack: the Grateful Dead’s “Cassidy,” in which the singer comes to grips with his friend’s death, recalling various epic deeds, but finally picturing his loss as a flock of birds that all take off simultaneously, each a particle of a larger flock. He ends the song by letting go, letting the spirit of his friend go:

Fare thee well now. Let your life proceed by its own design –
Nothing to tell now. Let the words be yours, I’m done with mine.

The Grateful Dead have lots of songs about letting go — “Bird Song,” “Box of Rain,” “Looks Like Rain,” “Black Peter,” “Brokedown Palace,” “He’s Gone,” and “Cassidy, to name just a few that come to mind. These songs always manage, beat or hippy-style, to spin their losses philosophically, as either the release from pain or the setting free of a spirit. In these songs, loss could be a death (of Cassidy, of Phil Lesh’s father, of an original band member nicknamed Pigpen) or a breakup of a lover, and the sense of both missing someone and of letting them go runs through their lyrics. The singer celebrates the loss even as he cries over the grief — we cannot hold someone against their will, and we cannot hold back their life’s journey to satisfy our sense of possession, grief, or anger. Our memories of the one we’ve lost serve as a meditative starting point, rather than an ending, and these Grateful Dead songs are the beautiful results of losses.

This philosophy feels a bit to me a bit like the end of Kerouac’s On The Road, a story of beat-generation writers and adventurers. And perhaps this is not surprising, for not only was Kerouac’s footloose roadster Dean Moriarty based on Neil Cassady (as Kerouac experienced him and wrote him), but Cassady’s death is also the inspiration for the Grateful Dead’s “Cassidy” song, and the vastness of the imagery is evident in both works.

On the last page of On The Road, the narrator recalls his friend Dean walking away from him, not looking back, and is propelled into a reflection on the vastness of America and its industrial and agricultural and natural wonders, his narrative point of view pulling upwards like a giant aerial camera shot in a movie.

Dean, ragged in a moth-eaten overcoat he brought especially for the freezing temperatures of the east, walked off alone, and the last I saw of him, he rounded the corner of Seventh Avenue, eyes on the street ahead, and bent to it again…. Old Dean’s gone, I thought, and out loud I said, “He’ll be all right.” And off we went to the sad and disinclined concert for which I had no stomach whatever and all the time I was thinking of Dean and how he got back on the train and rode over three thousand miles over that awful land and never knew why he had come anyway, except to see me.

So, in America when the sun goes down and I sit on the old broken-down river pier watching the long, long skies over New Jersey and sense all that raw land that rolls in one unbelievable huge bulge over to the West Coast, all that road going, and all the people dreaming in the immensity of it, and in Iowa I know by now that children must be crying in the land where the let the children cry, and tonight the stars’ll be out, and don’t you know that God is Pooh Bear? The evening star must be drooping and shedding her sparkler dims on the prairie, which is just before the coming of complete night that blesses the earth, darkens all rivers, cups the peaks and folds the final shore in, and nobody, nobody knows what’s going to happen to anybody besides the forlorn rags of growing old. I think of Dean Moriarty, I even think of Old Dean Moriarty the father we never found. I think of Dean Moriarty, I think of Dean Moriarty.

This cinematographer-philosopher’s vastness and the his recollection of Dean Moriarty — his loss of Dean as well as his vision of their adventures across America — are tied together in a mutual cause-and-effect relationship, for not only does the act of reflecting on Dean call to mind the immensity of the country, but thinking about the vastness of America also causes the narrator to think of Dean Moriarty. In other words, the loss isn’t a self-contained, festering sore, but rather it’s an expansive feedback loop that occasions philosophical grandeur.

Which, in my own grand stream of consciousness of loss, brings me once more to Walt Whitman, master of similar poetic techniques that tie together both the tiny and the vast. At the end of “Leaves of Grass,” the narrator bids the reader farewell and dissolves into the very landscape that has formed the fabric of the poem. This loss of the narrator is not to be mourned, but instead creates an opportunity for the reader to look everywhere for the poet — in the air, the dirt, the water, the rocks:

The spotted hawk swoops by and accuses me, he complains of my gab and my loitering.

I too am not a bit tamed, I too am untranslatable,
I sound my barbaric yawp over the roofs of the world.

The last scud of day holds back for me,
It flings my likeness after the rest and true as any on shadow’d wilds,
It coaxes me to the vapor and the dusk.

I depart as air, I shake my white locks at the runaway sun,
I effuse my flesh in eddies, and drift it in lacy jags.

I bequeath myself to the dirt to grow from the grass I love,
If you want me again look for me under your boot-soles.

You will hardly know who I am or what I mean,
But I shall be good health to you nevertheless,
And filter and fibre your blood.

Failing to fetch me at first keep encouraged,
Missing me one place search another,
I stop somewhere waiting for you.

Am I over-thinking this? Am I grasping for a more philosophical, expansive explanation of this loss than is called for? Perhaps. Perhaps it’s just a plain old rejection.

But my feelings are my own, and I own up to them, and I know that these feelings about Wade’s rejection do not necessarily have to involve despair or depression, and I believe that life’s downward twists have more meaning than simple explanations convey. Make no mistake, my sense of loss feels like a hole in my body filled with a stinging emptiness, but I think it also serves as a catalyst for reflection and understanding and hope.

Maybe the only thing that will come from my reflection is this essay. Maybe this experience will serve to keep me honest and educate me as to the likelihood of future acceptance and rejection. Or maybe these words will be diffused into the air and water and rocks and become part of the fabric of vast narratives.

And when you see the birds wheeling to the sunrise-orange sky at the beach, when you think of the small towns and universities and plains and mountains and islands and country roads and highways that have defined the geography of your life, when you contemplate the thousand tangles of fate and fortune that bring us together and split us asunder, when words fail you as you lie on your back in the grass, scanning the skies for the planets and stars and comets and satellites in the deepening dusk, perhaps you will catch yourself thinking of me and looking for me underfoot.

I will wait for you.

In his message to me, Wade writes, “I barely recognize you anymore.” Without going into his logic, or my loss, I would like to explore the word “recognize” because it contains assumptions about the world and about the speaker’s relationship to that world.

The root is gnoscere from Latin (and gno in Indo-European), which means “to know,” and is found in reconnaissance, reconnoiter, gnosticism, and other words that have to do with knowing or learning. So co-gnoscere would have the “co” for “with” or “together” and the “re” means this co-knowing takes place again. The way we’ve used words for the past hundred years makes it seem as if “cog” is somehow the root of this word, which isn’t really harmful because it also ties together the concept of cognition and mental processing.

The word comes from O.Fr., from L. recognoscere “acknowledge, recall to mind, know again, examine, certify,” from re- “again” + cognoscere “know” (from co- “with” + gnoscere “become acquainted;).

The list of definitions shows that the act involves knowing, accepting, approving, or admitting something or someone, often a thing or person that was known before.

  1. To know to be something that has been perceived before: recognize a face.
  2. To know or identify from past experience or knowledge: recognize hostility.
  3. To perceive or show acceptance of the validity or reality of: recognizes the concerns of the tenants.
  4. To show awareness of; approve of or appreciate: recognize services rendered.
  5. To admit the acquaintance of, as by salutation: recognize an old friend with a cheerful greeting.

You can forget a face or a place, but the act of recognizing it involves an act of re-knowing it, and realizing that you do, in fact, know this place. The act of recognizing is active, requiring some amount of mental effort (or cognition) to place new information (odd face or place) into a context of prior knowledge, weaving the past and present into one reality, or recognition.

In other words, recognition isn’t a passive activity; the new information doesn’t recognize the passive you, but you and your mind have to do the activity to arrive at a re-cognition.

To return to Wade’s statement about barely recognizing me any more, his words suggest that he is able to weave the new Joyce information together with his long history with George, but just barely. The “barely” suggests a feat that’s achievable, but dangerous and extremely trying, and I picture Wade hanging from a ledge, and while it’s technically possible to pull himself up, it’s not worth the effort. Maybe it’s not a very long drop, or maybe his fingers are giving out, or maybe the goal of being safe on the ledge simply isn’t all that attractive any more.

In other words, I think he’s trying, but it sounds as if the effort is too much — the mental activity of making two very disparate sets of facts make once set of sense is overwhelming him, and his choice, sadly for me, is to give up on this work, perhaps taking the route of nostalgia and the safe, known, and unified past over the disjointed, dangerous, and confusing present.

And I don’t blame him. The struggle that he is abandoning sounds a lot like my own struggle to integrate my old ways, including retaining all that was good about me, with my new ways, new body, and new challenges. And believe me, I am struck by the very same thought Wade voices, that “I barely recognize myself these days,” but unlike Wade, I don’t have the leisure of turning away from the mental struggle to re-learn myself. The ledge on which I had been hanging jutted out over an abyss, and while it was tempting to let go, I felt (and continue to feel) that pulling myself up was worth it. It’s a struggle I undertake every day — I am in a constant process of self-re-cognizing, as I have to make sense of new relationships, feelings, physical sensations.

I have to share with you, dear readers, just how frightening and difficult this process can be. Sometimes I feel like a traveler in a strange land, yearning for the comforts of home — I barely know the language and the customs, and some days are downright alien. But some days (and increasingly, a lot of the time), I feel as if I do belong in this land, that I’m no longer a visitor, but perhaps a permanent alien who might some day feel like she was actually born here. This process of becoming familiar with my new self is the process of re-cognizing who I am, actively weaving together memories, thoughts, and habits from my past with the daily sensations of the present and the hoped-for citizenship of the future. It is not something that can be done passively — it takes work, persistence in the face of setbacks, and hope that the integration I seek will be recognizable to my self and to others.

Friendship, like recognition, takes work — active work — to nurture the ties, understand each other, and accept mutual changes. If we treat our friendships as passive, self-propelled relationships, we will arrive at a time where our friendships barely exist. If our friendships are worth having, it seems to me they’re also worth the work.

From the previous posts, the reader knows I was seeking a name and gender change through court order. I got a call from BillyJean Dixon, my attorney, a couple of days ago, who told me that we had a court date this morning at 8:15. This news was exciting, frightening, and unnerving because I had imagined being placed on the docket in October or November.

So I found myself on a waiting bench outside the row of elevators on the third floor of our country courthouse at 8:10. BillyJean arrived at 8:25, just as I was beginning to get quite nervous that I had gone to the wrong place. We sat on the bench and she explained that we would swear, under oath, all the reasons and facts in my petition in the judge’s chambers.

We met Judge Overhill, a tall, semi-portly man with kind eyes and a mustache, promptly at 8:30, where he made me swear to tell the truth. BillyJean then asked me all the facts in the petition, one by one. She also handed the judge a letter from Chuck Garcia, my therapist, which he read while he jotted down some notes in blue ink in my file. He read aloud one part of the letter, where Chuck wrote that “Joyce lives and works 24 hours a day as a woman,” to which he asked, “You don’t really work 24 hours a day, do you?”

“It seems like it, Judge, but no, I do sleep when I can.”

“OK,” he said, “Petition granted. Congratulations.”

And that was it. I shook the judge’s hand and BillyJean and I left to walk down to the first floor filing office, where we filed the order, the fingerprints, and the other paperwork, and where I received three official copies of the order. BillyJean said we were done, shook my hand, and rushed off to another meeting, leaving me standing alone in the hallway of the county courthouse, all other urgent business having begun in courtrooms and offices elsewhere.

I had expected this episode to feel momentous, but instead it felt like a formality. Perhaps the gravity will sink in later, if at all. I do feel the court order, signed by the judge and filed at the courthouse, has almost magical powers because it represents a new and different kind of transition, a legal one, and this transition has consequences involving paperwork, correspondence, and explaining my situation at every office I visit to change my name and gender marker.

This transition pales in difficulty and import to the social, hormonal, and psychological transition(s) I’ve undergone for the past couple of years. But it feels good to be legitimate.


ORDER GRANTING CHANGE OF NAME OF ADULT AND GENDER MARKER CHANGE

On August 21, 2008, the Court heard the Petition for Change of Name of Adult and Gender Marker Change of GEORGE MICHAEL BAILEY, Petitioner.
Petitioner appeared in person and through attorney of record, BillyJean Dixon, and announced ready.
The Court finds that it has jurisdiction of the case and GEORGE MICHAEL BAILEY.
The making of a record of testimony was waived with the consent of the Court.
The Court finds:
1. Petitioner is an adult.
2. Petitioner’s full true name is GEORGE MICHAEL BAILEY.
3. Petitioner’s sex is Male.
4. Petitioner’s race is Caucasian.
5. Petitioner was born on 09/09/1909 in xxxxx, xxxxx County, Texas.
6. Petitioner’s driver’s license numbers of any license issued within the past ten years is: Texas DL# 999999.
7. Petitioner’s Social Security number is 999-99-9999.
8. Petitioner has no FBI number or SID number.
9. No offense has been charged against Petitioner above the grade of class C misdemeanor.
10. Petitioner has not been finally convicted of a felony and is not subject to the registration requirements of chapter 62 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
11. Petitioner’s change of name and gender marker change is in the interest or to the benefit of Petitioner and is in the interest of the public.

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s name is changed from GEORGE MICHAEL BAILEY to JOYCE xxxxx xxx, and the Court hereby grant the request and ORDERS that the gender marker on the original birth certificate be change from MALE to FEMALE.

IT IS ORDERED that all relief requested in this case and not expressly granted is denied.

SIGNED on August 21, 2008

JUDGE PRESIDING

Next Page »